+- How2pass.com Forums (https://www.how2pass.com/forum)
+-- Forum: CCNP (https://www.how2pass.com/forum/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum (https://www.how2pass.com/forum/forum-15.html)
+--- Thread: wrong answer i think (/thread-1702.html)
wrong answer i think - BManager - 12-28-2019
I think you have a wrong answer:
You are configuring a Microsoft client to call a PPP server using CHAP. Only the client will be authenticated, but the client’s password has expired and must be changed. Which PPP server configuration allows the call to be completed?
ppp authentication chap callin
ppp autherwntication chap
ppp authentication ms-chap-v2
ppp authentication ms-chap-v2 callin
ppp authentication ms-chap callin
correct me if i'm wrong but you have answer has ppp authentication ms-chap-v2 but i think the answer is ppp authentication ms-chap-v2 callin
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wan/point-to-point-protocol-ppp/25647-understanding-ppp-chap.html
RE: wrong answer i think - forumsupport - 12-29-2019
Look at the last sentence of the question:
"Which PPP server configuration allows the call to be completed". So the correct answer should be a configuration command on the server. For one-way authentication, the command needed on the server does not use the callin option.
We have added detailed explanation to this question.
RE: wrong answer i think - BManager - 12-29-2019
(12-29-2019, 05:32 PM)forumsupport Wrote: Look at the last sentence of the question:Thanks Admin makes sense
"Which PPP server configuration allows the call to be completed". So the correct answer should be a configuration command on the server. For one-way authentication, the command needed on the server does not use the callin option.
We have added detailed explanation to this question.
RE: wrong answer i think - legionuk - 01-11-2020
RTE768 appears wrong - which BGP option is required when sharing over multiple equal-path links?
I think eBGP Multipath should be the correct answer.
But the answer in the test says it should be ebgp multihop.
Regards,
Adam
RE: wrong answer i think - forumsupport - 01-11-2020
The keywords for RTE768 are "single CE router" and "single ISP router". Do you have some reference or explanation to support your answer? Did you check the Cisco doc URL given in explanation?
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13762-40.html#anc4
!--- Use the IP address of the loopback interface for TCP connections.
neighbor 2.2.2.2 ebgp-multihop
!--- You must configure ebgp-multihop whenever the external BGP (eBGP)
!--- connections are not on the same network address.
RE: wrong answer i think - legionuk - 01-12-2020
(01-11-2020, 05:42 PM)forumsupport Wrote: Thanks for responding back with that cisco page you do thankfully appear to be correct. Regards Adam
RE: wrong answer i think - legionuk - 01-13-2020
Hi I think RTE:956 is wrong
if there
Hi,
RTE956 appears incorrect. You advise that variance is adds a route if a route is less than metric X variance
But cisco advise that is is less than / equal too. Therefore a best path of 10, with a variance of 2 would enable routes with a metric of 20 to be included.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/enhanced-interior-gateway-routing-protocol-eigrp/13677-19.html
This configuration increases the minimum metric to 40 (2 * 20 = 40). EIGRP includes all routes that have a metric of less than or equal to 40 and satisfy the feasibility condition.
Regards,
Adam
RE: wrong answer i think - BManager - 01-13-2020
(01-13-2020, 07:41 PM)legionuk Wrote: Hi I think RTE:956 is wrongmetric is 10 x 2 is 20
if there
Hi,
RTE956 appears incorrect. You advise that variance is adds a route if a route is less than metric X variance
But cisco advise that is is less than / equal too. Therefore a best path of 10, with a variance of 2 would enable routes with a metric of 20 to be included.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/enhanced-interior-gateway-routing-protocol-eigrp/13677-19.html
This configuration increases the minimum metric to 40 (2 * 20 = 40). EIGRP includes all routes that have a metric of less than or equal to 40 and satisfy the feasibility condition.
Regards,
Adam
rule is "A feasible successor is a path whose reported distance is less than the feasible distance" (not equil to this is incorrect)
so the answer "if there are 2 paths with 10 (which is less than 20) and 2 paths with 20 wif is equil to (not allowed there would be 2 total paths used this is correct
RE: wrong answer i think - forumsupport - 01-14-2020
@Adam
The link you posted is very old document, and has incorrect definition of feasibility condition.
Check this discussion:
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/24103