+- How2pass.com Forums (https://www.how2pass.com/forum)
+-- Forum: CCNP (https://www.how2pass.com/forum/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum (https://www.how2pass.com/forum/forum-15.html)
+--- Thread: arx06 (/thread-2311.html)
arx06 - pc_evans - 03-12-2024
It appears the exhibit forgot to name the route-maps.
the route-map is named 'deny'
the second route-map is named 'permit'
neither route-map contains a permit or deny clause. GNS3 shows that Route-maps can be configured without a permit or deny clause. Configuring a route-map this way results in an implicit permit.
The exhibit is either wrong, or the answers are wrong.
If we assume the route-maps are intended to be named 'deny' and 'permit' we do not know which route map is applied.
!!! Route-map named 'deny' with no permit/deny clause defaults to permit
R4(config)#route-map ?
WORD Route map tag
R4(config)#route-map deny ?
<0-65535> Sequence to insert to/delete from existing route-map entry
deny Route map denies set operations
permit Route map permits set operations
<cr>
R4(config)#route-map deny 10
R4(config-route-map)#match address 10
R4(config-route-map)#do sh route-map
route-map deny, permit, sequence 10
Match clauses:
ip address (access-lists): 10
Set clauses:
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
!!! route-map named 'deny' with a deny clause denies any match.
R5(config)#route-map deny deny 10
R5(config-route-map)#match address 10
R5(config-route-map)#do sh route-map
route-map deny, deny, sequence 10
Match clauses:
ip address (access-lists): 10
Set clauses:
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
RE: arx06 - help_desk - 04-14-2024
The question has been removed due to missing information.