01-25-2011, 05:50 PM
I hope I am not violating the posting rules by re-posting the question in the forum...
I'm not certain on the answer for this question. The correct answer shows that the router will prefer the next hop of
172.26.1.1 for packets destined to 192.168.1.0 network. Is this simply because of the lower router-id for the eBGP peers?
Or is there some sort of typo here where acl 65 should really be acl 20...? ? ? I am assuming a default local-pref of 100 for
each peer..
router bgp 65001
neighbor 172.16.1.1 remote-as 65001
neighbor 172.26.1.1 remote-as 65555
neighbor 172.26.1.1 route-map local_pref in
neighbor 172.30.1.1 remote-as 65510
!
route-map local-pref permit 10
match ip address 20
set local-preference 200
!
access-list 65 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
!
I'm not certain on the answer for this question. The correct answer shows that the router will prefer the next hop of
172.26.1.1 for packets destined to 192.168.1.0 network. Is this simply because of the lower router-id for the eBGP peers?
Or is there some sort of typo here where acl 65 should really be acl 20...? ? ? I am assuming a default local-pref of 100 for
each peer..
router bgp 65001
neighbor 172.16.1.1 remote-as 65001
neighbor 172.26.1.1 remote-as 65555
neighbor 172.26.1.1 route-map local_pref in
neighbor 172.30.1.1 remote-as 65510
!
route-map local-pref permit 10
match ip address 20
set local-preference 200
!
access-list 65 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
!