Here is an example of a question with no explanation.  Most questions are like this:

QID:AN587

Here is an example of an incorrect answer.  There are a shocking number of these:

QID:AN404

(12-14-2023, 01:43 AM)rexhanemann Wrote: Here is an example of a question with no explanation.  Most questions are like this:

QID:AN587

Here is an example of an incorrect answer.  There are a shocking number of these:

QID:AN404

I took this exam last month and failed, how2pass on this paticular occasion was not helpful at all 

The VRF lab seems to have the incorrect interfaces for vrf cu-green on R1 and R2. It states they should be applied to the e0/0 interfaces when cu-red was applied to them in an earlier step. Shouldn't cu-green be applied to the routers e0/1 interfaces?

Has anyone recently taken the exam and can report on the number of labs?

KThxBye

Hi, 

Are the exam questions updated CCNP 350-401? Cisco announced new version on Sept 20, just wondering if h2pass has all the questions updated to the newer version of the exam?

To whom it may concern,

This question does not follow the standard ruleset of EUI-64 in regard to creation of IPv6 addresses.

Does anyone have a proper explanation for why the answer is what it is?

Thank you,

The answer provided is the following:
2001:DB8:D8D2:1009:10A0:ABFF:FECC:1 eui-64
(Not sure where 10 is coming from?)

Possible correction?
Shouldn't the answer use the MAC address that is shown in the Exhibit:
2001:DB8:D8D2:1009:12A0:ABFF:FECC:1 eui-64

Did someone recently took Enarsi exam? Are these still valid as i saw cisco mention after 20th September 2023 candidates can expect to be tested on new exam material.

Thanks H2P, I passed my exam 2 weeks ago. 

I got a decent score as well! 

If you study the blueprint along with using H2P you should pass easily! 

Thanks again for all your hard work and effort guys.

Hello,

I wonder if the answer is incorrect here?

"router ospf 1
network 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0
network 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 area 0
passive-interface Gi0/2"

Seems to be correct for me because it includes all networks  and excludes Gi0/2 from exchanging OSPF information?